Search search/race: race

With the work of the Governor’s Task Force for Racial Equity in Criminal Justice under way, it is timely to consider the issue of racial equity in the juvenile justice system. Issues of racial and ethnic disproportionality and disparity in juvenile justice have been discussed and studied in juvenile justice systems across the country for decades, as federal juvenile justice funding for states has long been tied to their study. See the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention’s Racial and Ethnic Disparities page for more information on the federal requirement.

North Carolina’s most recent study, Disproportionate Minority Contact in North Carolina: An Assessment Study (hereinafter “Assessment Study”), funded by the Governor’s Crime Commission and authored by Stan Orchowsky, Ph.D. of Cambiare Consulting and Michael Leiber, Ph.D., and Chae Jaynes, Ph.D., of the University of South Florida, was released in June of 2019. The findings reveal that, while there is significant local variation across counties in North Carolina, youth of color are represented throughout the juvenile justice system in far greater numbers than they are represented in the general population. These disparities are most profound at the very front door of the juvenile justice system and at the deepest end of the system in secure confinement. They are also most profound for Black youth.

The gravity of the events of recent weeks stemming from the highly publicized killings of several black citizens, including George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and Rayshard Brooks, has led for a call to acknowledge and respond to systemic racism in the United States. Initially, the focus was on the actions of the police, but the call to action has grown, asking Americans to address inequities based on race as a whole within our country. That begs the question, is race a factor in the child welfare system? The answer is yes.

Today’s post was written by my colleague Alyson Grine. While she works and writes primarily about criminal law, the topic of implicit bias is an important one for the civil side of things as well.

READ POST "Implicit Bias: Why Race is Hard Even when People are Good* (January 20, 2016)"

On behalf of myself and my colleagues, we are excited to announce the availability of three new resources addressing abuse, neglect, dependency (A/N/D), and termination of parental rights (TPR) proceedings. […]

The Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina (Lumbee) has received full federal recognition through the Lumbee Fairness Act, which was included in the National Defense Authorization Act. The law was signed by the President, granting full federal recognition to the Lumbee on December 18, 2025. This is an extraordinary time for the Lumbee, who will have access to services and resources (such as support with education, health care, and housing) from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) as well as the right to self-governance.

One immediate change is the application of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) to the Lumbee. This change impacts abuse, neglect, dependency (A/N/D) and termination of parental rights (TPR) action. (It also impacts all adoptions of minors (including stepparent adoptions but that is beyond the scope of this post)

There are additional protections ICWA provides in A/N/D and TPR proceedings when an Indian child is involved. An Indian child now includes a juvenile who is either (1) a member of the Lumbee or (2) eligible for membership with the Lumbee and who have a biological parent who is a member of a fully federally recognized Indian tribe. See 25 U.S.C. 1903(4) & 25 C.F.R. 23.2 (definition of “Indian child”). There are new steps the court and participants must follow when an Indian child who is affiliated with the Lumbee is the subject of the suit. Although these changes are effective now (and started on December 18, 2025), this is a time of significant transition for the Lumbee, where procedures and policies are being created and implemented.

In Wenninger v. Wenninger, decided May 7, 2024, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held that an equitable distribution judgment was void for lack of a necessary party because the […]

In a series of recent decisions from the Court of Appeals, tenants in federally subsidized and federally funded properties have challenged whether the notice they received from their landlords was […]

The North Carolina Court of Appeals in In re A.K., ___ N.C. App. ____ (Aug. 6, 2024) addressed a parent’s right to be represented by a privately retained attorney of their choosing in an abuse, neglect, and dependency (A/N/D) action. See Timothy Heinle’s post discussing that issue here. The opinion also discusses issues related to the mother’s and child’s culture – their religion and language. This post explores those aspects of the opinion.

In North Carolina, when an adult is adjudicated incompetent and guardianship is ordered, guardianship is permanent until the first of these two developments occur: (i) the ward’s competency is restored, […]

Consider a custody action brought by a grandparent against the mother of a child. Grandmother is seeking primary custody, arguing that mother is unfit and has waived her constitutional right […]