Archive

• DVPOs for Same-Sex Dating Relationships?

  This entry was contributed by Jeff Welty on August 15, 2017 at 10:47 am and is filed under Domestic Violence.

  This post is also published on the NC Criminal Law blog. 

  Domestic violence protective orders (DVPOs) are available to “persons of the opposite sex who are . . . or have been in a dating relationship,” and who are able to establish that the person that they are or were dating committed an act of domestic violence against them. Persons of the same sex who are or were in a dating relationship don’t have the same opportunity. Is that constitutional? The Supreme Court of South Carolina just addressed a related question, and its opinion suggests that the answer is no. Continue Reading

• More on DVPOs: What is a ‘Dating Relationship’?

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on July 10, 2015 at 5:00 am and is filed under Domestic Violence, Family Law.

  In my last post, Ex Parte DVPOs, I promised more on ex parte DVPOs. But the Court of Appeals issued an important decision this week on another aspect of Chapter 50B – the definition of ‘dating relationship’ – so I’ll come back to ex parte orders later.

  Continue Reading

• 50B Consent Orders: Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on April 10, 2015 at 5:00 am and is filed under Civil Law, Family Law.

  Chapter 50B expressly authorizes entry of consent DVPOs, GS 50B-1(c), and many cases are resolved in this way. Overall, this is a good thing because consent orders:

  • Spare both parties, who often are appearing pro se, the stress and uncertainty of a trial;
  • Allow the parties to create orders that will best meet their specific needs; and
  • Conserve valuable court time.

  It is not uncommon for a defendant to be willing to agree to the entry of an order but not willing to agree that the specific acts alleged in the complaint actually occurred.  Can a DVPO be entered without the specifics?

  Continue Reading