Archive

• Determining Eligibility for Return of Guns

  This entry was contributed by Phil Dixon, Cheryl Howell on August 10, 2022 at 9:00 am and is filed under Uncategorized.

  This post was written by my SOG colleague Phil Dixon. You can reach Phil at dixon@sog.unc.edu

  Lately I have received a number of questions relating to whether it is appropriate to return guns following a temporary firearms disqualification. The issue seems to arise most commonly when a domestic violence restraining order (“DVPO”) is issued under Chapter 50B of the North Carolina General Statutes, which requires the surrender of guns by a defendant in certain circumstances and allows the defendant to seek return of the guns following the expiration of the order and final disposition of any related criminal charges. See G.S. 50B-3.1.

  Continue Reading

• Domestic violence protective orders: when is a stepparent acting in loco parentis?

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on October 21, 2020 at 8:30 am and is filed under Domestic Violence.

  A plaintiff cannot obtain a Civil No-Contact Order pursuant to GS Chapter 50C against a defendant younger than 16 years of age. GS 50C-1(7). There is no similar general restriction on the age of defendants for claims brought pursuant to GS Chapter 50B seeking a Domestic Violence Protective Order. So, for example, a plaintiff may seek Chapter 50B protection against a current or former household member who is 13 years old or against someone 15 years old with whom plaintiff has been in a dating relationship. See blog post, March 13, 2015, Minor Parties in 50B Cases.

  Continue Reading

• It’s Time for a New SOG Cohort of Elder Abuse Multidisciplinary Teams

  This entry was contributed by Meredith Smith, Aimee Wall on August 28, 2020 at 8:00 am and is filed under Guardianship.

  How does elder abuse show up in your community?

  How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected how that abuse happens or how local professionals respond to it?

  A new opportunity to address these concerns is opening up September 9th.The intent of the North Carolina Elder Protection Network is to connect, inform, and support our public professionals who are working together to find ways to prevent and respond to abuse of older adults.

  Continue Reading

• Domestic Violence Protective Orders: sometimes phone calls to plaintiff in NC can establish ‘minimum contacts’

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on August 12, 2020 at 9:00 am and is filed under Domestic Violence, Family Law, Jurisdiction.

  ****UPDATE TO THIS POST: The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals discussed below. See Mucha v. Wagner, N.C. (August 13, 2021).

   

  I wrote about personal jurisdiction requirements in Chapter 50B civil domestic violence protection cases in these two earlier blog posts: Domestic Violence: DVPOs Require Personal Jurisdiction, September 9, 2016 and Domestic Violence: More on Mannise and Personal Jurisdiction, September 16, 2016.

  Continue Reading

• Domestic Violence: Recent Changes to Chapter 50B

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on December 6, 2017 at 8:00 am and is filed under Domestic Violence.

  The North Carolina General Assembly recently made two important changes to Chapter 50B regarding civil domestic violence protective orders. S.L. 2017-92, “Domestic Violence Appeals and Modifications”, was effective October 1, 2017.

  Continue Reading

• DVPOs for Same-Sex Dating Relationships?

  This entry was contributed by Jeff Welty on August 15, 2017 at 10:47 am and is filed under Domestic Violence.

  This post is also published on the NC Criminal Law blog. 

  Domestic violence protective orders (DVPOs) are available to “persons of the opposite sex who are . . . or have been in a dating relationship,” and who are able to establish that the person that they are or were dating committed an act of domestic violence against them. Persons of the same sex who are or were in a dating relationship don’t have the same opportunity. Is that constitutional? The Supreme Court of South Carolina just addressed a related question, and its opinion suggests that the answer is no. Continue Reading

• More on DVPOs: What is a ‘Dating Relationship’?

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on July 10, 2015 at 5:00 am and is filed under Domestic Violence, Family Law.

  In my last post, Ex Parte DVPOs, I promised more on ex parte DVPOs. But the Court of Appeals issued an important decision this week on another aspect of Chapter 50B – the definition of ‘dating relationship’ – so I’ll come back to ex parte orders later.

  Continue Reading

• 50B Consent Orders: Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law

  This entry was contributed by Cheryl Howell on April 10, 2015 at 5:00 am and is filed under Civil Law, Family Law.

  Chapter 50B expressly authorizes entry of consent DVPOs, GS 50B-1(c), and many cases are resolved in this way. Overall, this is a good thing because consent orders:

  • Spare both parties, who often are appearing pro se, the stress and uncertainty of a trial;
  • Allow the parties to create orders that will best meet their specific needs; and
  • Conserve valuable court time.

  It is not uncommon for a defendant to be willing to agree to the entry of an order but not willing to agree that the specific acts alleged in the complaint actually occurred.  Can a DVPO be entered without the specifics?

  Continue Reading