Derek was twenty years old when he suffered a stroke. He lost and then subsequently regained his ability to speak and to perform simple tasks; however, he cannot manage important matters like his medical care and finances. Derek’s mom, Greta, successfully petitioned under G.S. Chapter 35A to have her son adjudicated incompetent and was appointed as Derek’s guardian.

Recently, Derek was at a store and put candy he had not paid for in his pocket. When an employee intervened, Derek pushed the employee and ran home with the candy. Criminal charges were filed, and Derek was appointed counsel. This post explores difficult questions that arise when a criminal defendant is adjudicated incompetent and has a court-appointed guardian, including the effect those circumstances have on criminal case decisions, client confidentiality, and the allocation of authority between the attorney and client.

Continue Reading

The provisions in the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (the UCCJEA), N.C. Gen Stat., Chapter 50A, define a trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction to enter a child custody determination. This means that if the requirements of the Act are not followed, a custody determination will be void ab initio.

The UCCJEA allows communication between courts in different states when a judge determines communication is necessary for a court to determine whether and how it can exercise jurisdiction. The Act requires communication between courts in different states in two specific circumstances, and the Act sets out the procedure to be followed whenever a court communicates with a court in another state.

This book is a comprehensive legal reference created for North Carolina district court judges. The 2024 edition provides summaries of North Carolina law governing family law cases routinely heard in district court, with statutory and case law updated through October 15, 2024. Because of its large size, the print edition is published in two bound parts: Part A (876 pages) and Part B (798 pages). It is divided by topic into twelve chapters:

A trust is a fiduciary relationship in which the trustee holds a property interest subject to an equitable obligation to manage or use that property for the benefit of a beneficiary. Unlike other common fiduciary relationships, a trust is not generally under continuing judicial oversight. The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by a party or as provided by law. A trust may be in effect for years before an issue arises that necessitates judicial action. When a court proceeding is filed related to the trust, the court may have little familiarity with the trustee, the trust, or the trust administration. Once the court resolves the matter or dispute brought before it, the trustee typically resumes administering the trust without further court oversight.

Our justice system depends on due process: the idea that legal proceedings follow established rules and individuals are protected from arbitrary acts of the government. One kind of due process, commonly called procedural due process, is guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and means that parties to judicial proceedings must have notice and an opportunity to be heard. Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 (1950).